Comparison between Florida and Federal Govt Corrosive Drywall Guidelines
HUD and CPSC recently released a document called “Interim Guidance – Identification of Homes with Corrosion from Problem Drywall”. While this document is similar to the State of Florida Case Definition released in December 2009, there are some differences. Below is a comparison of the two systems.
| State of Florida | CPSC/HUD |
| Criteria 1: Sentinel Indicators of Drywall Associated Corrosion (Possible Case = all 3)
|
Step 1. Visual inspection must show:(a) Blackening of copper electrical wiring and/or air conditioning evaporator coils; and
(b) The installation of new drywall (for new construction or renovations) between 2001 and 2008. A positive result for this step (including both criteria) is a prerequisite to any further consideration. |
| Criteria 2: Supporting Indicators of Drywall Associated Corrosion (Probable Case = 1 or more)
|
Step 2: Corroborating EvidenceBecause it is possible that corrosion of metal in homes can occur for other reasons, it is important to obtain additional corroborating evidence of problem drywall. Homes with the characteristic metal corrosion problems must also have at least 2 of these corroborating conditions if the new drywall was installed between 2005 and 2008. For installations between 2001 and 2004, at least 4 of the following conditions must be met. Collecting evidence of these corroborating conditions will in some cases require professional assessors and/or testing by analytical laboratories.
(a) Corrosive conditions in the home, demonstrated by the formation of copper sulfide on copper coupons (test strips of metal) placed in the home for a period of 2 weeks to 30 days or confirmation of thepresence of sulfur in the blackening of the grounding wires and/or air conditioning coils; (b) Confirmed markings of Chinese origin for drywall in the home; (c) Strontium levels in samples of drywall core found in the home (i.e. excluding the exterior paper surfaces) exceeding 1200 parts per million (ppm); (d) Elemental sulfur levels in samples of drywall core found in the home exceeding 10 ppm; (e) Elevated levels of hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide and/or carbon disulfide emitted from samples of drywall from the home when placed in test chambers using ASTM Standard Test Method D5504-08 or similar chamber or headspace testing4; (f) Corrosion of copper metal to form copper sulfide when copper is placed in test chambers with drywall samples taken from the home. |
| Criteria 3: Confirmatory Evidence of Drywall Associated Corrosion (Confirmed Case = 1 or more)
|
|
| Elemental sulfur (Orthorhombic sulfur, cyclooctasulfur, S8) content of gypsum core exceeding 10 mg/kg (ppm) | Elemental sulfur levels in samples of drywall core found in the home exceeding 10 ppm |
| Objective analysis of drywall in home finds Strontium levels exceed 2,000 mg/kg (ppm), indicating the gypsum used in the drywall was probably mined in China. | Strontium levels in samples of drywall core found in the home (i.e. excluding the exterior papersurfaces) exceeding 1200 parts per million (ppm); |
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
